He outed a bunch of people who were actively in the field undercover and put each of those people at risk. Had he redacted those names and published the rest, he likely would have a stronger public opinion position and weakened the gov't position on human asset harm.
JA isn't a good actor, but the gov't is full of the same. My point is, only give hero a hero's welcome. JA is not worthy.
Check out Taibbi’s piece on Murthy v Missouri. Supreme Court needs to go to jail. We have no rights, welcome to 1984 people!
He outed a bunch of people who were actively in the field undercover and put each of those people at risk. Had he redacted those names and published the rest, he likely would have a stronger public opinion position and weakened the gov't position on human asset harm.
JA isn't a good actor, but the gov't is full of the same. My point is, only give hero a hero's welcome. JA is not worthy.
Sock it to 'em, baby!